Stanislav KARPOV, сounsel, Co-head of Tax Disputes Practice
After the war began the Transitional Provisions of the Tax Code of Ukraine were added with par. 69.1, according whereto the conditions of exemption of taxpayers from liability were determined (in particular, related to adherence to deadlines for reporting and payment of tax obligations). Such conditions of exemption from liability for breaches of tax law, inter alia, depend on actual possibility for taxpayer to fulfil his tax obligations.
The procedure of confirmation of possibility or impossibility to fulfil the taxpayer’s obligations was to be adopted by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. However, the Ministry wasn’t in a hurry, and the respective Regulation was adopted only on 29 July 2022 (the Proctdure on confirmation of possibility or impossibility to fulfil the taxpayer’s obligations, listed by the par. 69.1 of par. 69 of Subsection 10 of Section XX “Transitional Provisions” of the Tax Code of Ukraine, and the List of documents for the purpose of confirmation, approved by the Regulation of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine as of 29 July 2022 No. 225). The Regulation was officially published and entered into force respectively on 6 September 2022.
As it appears from the title of the above-mentioned enactment, the List of documents for the purpose of confirmation was also approved.
The Regulation differs the grounds for impossibility to fulfil tax obligations by natural persons and by legal entities.
Thus, for legal entities such grounds can be, for example, as follows:
I may be affirmed, that the list of grounds is not exhaustive since any circumstances officially recognized as force majeure can be considered as a ground for impossibility to fulfil tax obligations.
As to the grounds for taxpayers-natural persons, they include some grounds determined for legal entities and, in addition, there are grounds as follows:
In the event, there are respective grounds, the taxpayer has a right to apply to the tax body for confirmation of impossibility to fulfil his tax obligations. The application is to be drawn up in free format and to contain obligatory data, defined by the abovementioned Regulation. Evidences (documents) are to be attached to the application based on the List of documents for the purpose of confirmation and on the specific circumstances (grounds).
The terms for filing applications are as follows:
The application is to be considered by the tax authority within 20 calendar days, but this term can be extended if the tax body takes preliminary decision due to the fact that submitted documents are not enough for final decision.
Should it be the case, the preliminary decision of tax body is to be sent to the taxpayer within 20 calendar days and is to include a suggestion to additionally submit specific documents needed to make final decision. The taxpayer is entitled to file additional documents and statements within 10 calendar days from the day next to the day of receiving the preliminary decision. Such additional documents and statements are to be considered by the tax body within 20 calendar days. If the taxpayer fails to submit additional evidences, the final decision is to be made based on initial taxpayer’s application.
To decide on the taxpayer’s applications the tax body is entitled to apply to the other authorities to confirm circumstances indicated in the taxpayer’s application. The tax body is obliged to prove the possibility or impossibility for the taxpayer to fulfil his tax obligations.
It is notable, that the Procedure authorizes the tax body to establish the cause-effect connection between the force majeure circumstances arisen out of the military aggression of Russian Federation and specific influence of such circumstances on the taxpayer / possibility to fulfil tax obligation as of the date which is a deadline for fulfilment of respective tax obligation. As is well-known, the right to recognize circumstances to be force majeure is granted to the Chambers of commerce and industry. Nevertheless, this time the tax bodies obtain much freedom with respect to force majeure issue. Having been aware of though fiscal approach of tax bodies, it can be anticipated that confirmation of force majeure circumstances before tax bodies will be much more difficult than before Chambers of commerce and industry.
Fortunately, the tax body’s decision on the possibility or impossibility to fulfill the tax obligation by the taxpayer may be appealed both under administrative procedure or to the court. Therefore, it can be reliably concluded that the new type of tax disputes is to arise in the nearest future.